doclong.blogg.se

1. #Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac for mac os
2. #Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac mac os x
3. #Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac upgrade
4. #Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac registration

#Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac mac os x

In comparison, the Finder in Mac OS X feels awkward. Up to 16 virtual desktops are available and you can customise any element of the GUI behaviour you don’t like. The Konqueror file manager supports internet URLs, and is one of the best web browsers currently available for Unix. You get drag-and-drop, right-click context-sensitive menus, Windows-like keyboard shortcuts (even the Windows keys on the keyboard work). KDE 2 wins because it works the way the majority of desktop GUI users expect - like classic Windows but with refinements. This is a controversial and subjective decision. The design isn’t quite as slick as Mac OS X or Windows XP, and there’s still some work left to do on the anti-aliasing of certain typefaces. KDE 2 is handsome, with a clear, Windows-inspired look. Still, the interface can get too busy, and the colour scheme is Freedom Furniture on a bad day. Windows XP isn’t too bad in the looks department, and I’m a fan of the ClearType font rendering technology. The drop-shadows for the program windows and the transparent menu sheets add to the tastiness, and make everything else look dated.

#Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac for mac os

Photographic icons, beautifully rendered fonts and a clean yet stylish design brings home the trophy in the looks competition for Aqua, the interface for Mac OS X. That said, neither the Red Hat nor the Mandrake installer has the slickness of their Mac OS X or Windows XP counterparts. Even the classic Unix installation hurdles - such as disk partitioning and video configuration - are taken care of. Linux installations have come amazingly far in the last few years.

#Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac upgrade

For older versions of Windows, you need to think about whether or not to upgrade your file system, and if your applications will run on Windows XP. The easiest upgrade scenario is from a networked Windows 2000 setup with NTFS disks. There’s some character-mode ugliness in the Windows XP installation process, which requires more user intervention than Mac OS X. Windows XP is almost as easy, but upgrades are only supported from Windows 98/SE, Me, NT.

#Windows xp sp2 emulator for mac registration

After you reboot, follow a few simple setup screens, fill in the compulsory registration and you’ll have a shiny new Mac desktop. That taken care of, just pop in the OS X CD, start the installation program, decide on which hard drive the installation should go, and take a break for half an hour. If you need to run older OS 9 apps, Mac OS 9.1 must be installed before upgrading to OS X (a simple matter of inserting a CD-ROM and clicking on an updater executable). Upgrading a suitable Macintosh to Mac OS X is a simple process. Mac OS X takes the victory here, tailed by Windows XP with Linux (using the Windows-like KDE 2 shell) in third place.

But how does it compare to a couple of the rivals? It’s stable, fast, supports just about every kind of new hardware there is, and is backed up by mountains of Win32 software. On the other hand, there’s no denying Windows XP is a very good general-purpose operating system. It’s big and requires plenty of system resources - it does run in 128MB, but only really becomes enjoyable with 256MB, a fast PIII/P4/Athlon CPU and a snappy graphics accelerator. Microsoft’s overhauled desk-top OS, Windows XP, has now been unleashed on the world. NOTE: This artricle was written in May with current versions of software at that time.